<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debt-rating agencies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevereads.com/weblog/2008/03/17/debt-rating-agencies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevereads.com/weblog/2008/03/17/debt-rating-agencies/</link>
	<description>Books and policy from an endlessly curious perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1-beta</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris r</title>
		<link>http://stevereads.com/weblog/2008/03/17/debt-rating-agencies/comment-page-1/#comment-5721</link>
		<dc:creator>chris r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevereads.com/weblog/?p=4080#comment-5721</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are info sources for certain classes of restaurants, for example Zagat&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are info sources for certain classes of restaurants, for example Zagat&#8217;s.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slaniel</title>
		<link>http://stevereads.com/weblog/2008/03/17/debt-rating-agencies/comment-page-1/#comment-5719</link>
		<dc:creator>slaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevereads.com/weblog/?p=4080#comment-5719</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Events in financial markets are not normally distributed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They still have a standard deviation. :-) Really what I meant was the beta coefficient as a measure of volatility, but beta still involves the standard deviation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>Events in financial markets are not normally distributed.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>They still have a standard deviation. :-) Really what I meant was the beta coefficient as a measure of volatility, but beta still involves the standard deviation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Thurston</title>
		<link>http://stevereads.com/weblog/2008/03/17/debt-rating-agencies/comment-page-1/#comment-5718</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevereads.com/weblog/?p=4080#comment-5718</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I really want to be looking at the &lt;i&gt;standard deviation&lt;/i&gt; of interest rates over a sufficiently long period...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Events in financial markets are not normally distributed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>I really want to be looking at the <i>standard deviation</i> of interest rates over a sufficiently long period&#8230;</blockquote>

<p>Events in financial markets are not normally distributed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Rosi-Kessel</title>
		<link>http://stevereads.com/weblog/2008/03/17/debt-rating-agencies/comment-page-1/#comment-5716</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Rosi-Kessel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevereads.com/weblog/?p=4080#comment-5716</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There&#039;s no Standard &amp; Poor&#039;s for restuarants &#091;&lt;i&gt;sic&lt;/i&gt;&#093;. So why is there an S&amp;P for securities?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s just complexity and information costs. It&#039;s pretty easy to size up a restaurant for taste and report your impressions. It&#039;s also not that difficult for health inspectors to come in and test for rat excrement. Evaluating a complex security may require a team of expert (each with their respective expertise) to spend several weeks or months digging into the books, building models, etc.. There&#039;s more to your question than just this one issue, I realize, but I do think complexity and high information costs are the core of the answer.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>There&#8217;s no Standard &#038; Poor&#8217;s for restuarants &#91;<i>sic</i>&#93;. So why is there an S&#038;P for securities?</blockquote>

<p>I think it&#8217;s just complexity and information costs. It&#8217;s pretty easy to size up a restaurant for taste and report your impressions. It&#8217;s also not that difficult for health inspectors to come in and test for rat excrement. Evaluating a complex security may require a team of expert (each with their respective expertise) to spend several weeks or months digging into the books, building models, etc.. There&#8217;s more to your question than just this one issue, I realize, but I do think complexity and high information costs are the core of the answer.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
