If this is true, it’s further evidence for my claim that we need a different ballot, and need to dispense with the primary system altogether. If Kasich really could beat Clinton as lopsidedly as the article claims, then we have a voting system that is manifestly not designed to choose candidates whom the people would vote for.

The alternative is obvious: put all choices before all voters on a single ballot.

I wonder how many things that we ascribe to “polarization” — which seems like a large, intractable problem — could in fact be solved by a small-bore change in how our ballots look.